| The mother was very
upset, and thought that she had a juvenile delinquent
on her hands. She had hoped, that by sending her
son to
Kingham, the school would not need to worry her about
what he got up to. She assumed that Kingham
would deal with it. Being so far away she could not
talk to her son, and any small incident appeared so
much worse in the retelling of the story.
On
previous occasions the punishment had been dished out
and taken; and that was the end of it. Teddy understood
how parents
worried about things like this, especially recently
widowed ones with young boys to bring up. As far
as Teddy was concerned the 'crime' had been committed,
the culprit was caught and punished - there was
no need for any further action. So he was not pleased that
the housemaster had contacted the parent without
consulting the Warden first.
I think that he had a
word in the right quarter, and explained how things
were dealt with at Teddie's academy.
He appeared to work on the principle that boys will
be boys, and that he would try to keep things within
the school. The aim being to not worry parents
unduly. Of
course if it was something serious, and he considered
that the parents needed to be informed, then
he would be
the person to contact
them. It was a good system and worked well. He
appeared to turn out reasonably civilised chaps!
To protect reputations the
name of the guilty party has been withheld.
However, our master criminal
was proven guilty, beyond all reasonable shadow of
doubt, because the perpetrator had left his
gloves in the off-license with his name and house number
clearly marked inside them. Fair Trading: Not
only did the 1960's store keeper sell to underage
customers, but being an honest trader returned the
gloves to the school. QED (Quod Erat Demonstrandum). |